adultdating

objective arguments for the benefit of mature marriages

So why there is an opinion what to leave in marriage after thirty - a problem?

Пессимистки will tell: « do not take … », оптимистки - « is not present worthy! ». One men will tell: « nonsenses! », others - « for whom are necessary old hangers!? » It is strange, that in the different countries sights at a question on a marriage such ordinary. The mentality of peoples of the postSoviet space promotes development of complexes and uncertainty in at women бальзаковского age and is more senior. In станах the West the marriage after thirty years is considered norm in every respect: the taken place career, the weighed approach to home life, a strong organism for a birth of the child, a material resources for his(its) development - all this objective arguments for the benefit of mature marriages (spoilage). So why it is necessary to hasten to leave in marriage for 18 years? Unless the age gives a guarantee of reliability of a marriage (spoilage)? And whether always the woman marries after thirty because do not take? And can - there is nobody?