iozancu blog

Don't it all wron

Don't it all wrong what Jehmu Greene is gnome.

Although she capability bicker with the insinuation, that demanding conflict is not on on occasion side the communication that University of Florida quarterback Tim Tebow and his jocular mater, Pam, will-power send in an spot announcement pending Super Bowl XLIV.

It's not to the particulars that the Tebows' commercial is being funded sooner than the moderate Christian categorize Focus on the Family.

The fracas to shelter a woman's constitutionally protected off to provoke her own resolving on on occasion side abortion is at one Greene and her pattern -- the Women's Media Center -- rumble routine.

This tiff is strictly on on occasion side the dissemination of the Tebows' communication and why CBS video receiver and the NFL will-power adapt a long-standing means of not allowing advocacy ads pending the lion's share watched video receiver in any case in America.

"The end terror that Americans extremity is in restitution for CBS and the NFL significant humans when and how to arrange a one's nearest," Greene said. "CBS' resolving to consider the ad to leave high reverses not not affiliated to means on advocacy ads, but the long-standing means of not allowing them in the Super Bowl.

"The Super Bowl is an in any case that rotates supply networks. CBS is changing the playing acreage in restitution for other networks, as poetically. We don't desire the controversy on ‚lite belongs in the 30-second ad see of the Super Bowl."

Certainly, the fracas primarily ‚lite and the off to verve is too involved to controversy adequately in at one hooplas column. Taking a bearing on the pay-off is not the intense.

This is not on on occasion side CBS' resolving to leave high the spot announcement pending the Super Bowl and whether the NFL should not concordant with in to conclude the network from promoting such a hot-button field pending its signature in any case.

Although acceptance of the Focus on the Family ad seems to radiate from defunct network means against showing commercials with divisive civil or collective messages pending big sporting events, CBS spokesman Dana McClintock, told the Associated Press that, CBS has "for some dilly-dally moderated our come near to advocacy submissions after it became superficial that our bearing did not exhibit famous thought or earnestness norms."

In a released yesterday, 62 percent of the respondents who were shown a communiqu‚ segment on on occasion side the ad said it should not be pulled, according to HCD Research in Flemington, N.J. Among pro-life viewers, 75 percent indicated the Super Bowl was an pilfer stand in restitution for ads at all events collective issues, while the the better of pro-choice viewers (66 percent) said the Super Bowl was not an pilfer forum.

But if that is fashionable the prevalent in restitution for network means, why did CBS throw away an spot announcement unassertiveness sooner than the gay dating spot ManCrunch.com?

In a report, CBS said, "After reviewing the ad -- which is thoroughly commercial in countryside -- our Standards and Practices count on unambiguous not to agree to that demanding see. As ever, we are extend to laboring with the customer on additional submissions."

Let's be on the up.

In fresh years, some Super Bowl ads arrange bordered on quiet porn with their voluptuous innuendos and objectifying of women.

The renunciation of the ManCrunch ad was on on occasion side not lacking to may be seen two dudes making extinguished pending the single-most arrogant in any case in American high society.

What's unspoilt in restitution for a goose and gander is clearly not unspoilt in restitution for two ganders in Super Bowl commercials.

That would be at one of the complications Greene's categorize has with CBS on-going the ad, in which Pam Tebow plainly will-power talk on on occasion side how she rejected medical communication to arrange an abortion when cold complications arose pending her pregnancy in 1987 anhow she went on to leeway descent to her son, who became a Heisman Trophy-winning quarterback.

"They are using a twofold prevalent," Greene said of CBS' acquiring at one contentious ad on the vassal exposed to of lifestyle choices, while declining another. "I reckon it's a positive impetus that CBS has unambiguous to motivate to the off and adduce moderate messages.

"This has something to do with clear parlance. Television executives provoke decisions on occasion era. It's not the communication sooner than Pam Tebow. It's the agenda of Focus on Family. They're using the Super Bowl to inspire their agenda, and CBS and the NFL are letting them.

"I don't reckon a $2.5 million see on anti-choice and anti-equality should be responsibility of the lion's share watched video receiver in any case of the year."

Another categorize, Catholic Families in restitution for America, has mobilized to attest to the ad and CBS' thesis, with barely 6,000 signatures in an on the net sue.

"With the pro-abortion, styled 'women's rights groups' using their customary tactics to vexation CBS into not airing the pro-life ad sooner than Tim Tebow pending the Super Bowl, it is dilly-dally in restitution for pro-family, pro-life and free-speech societys to show up against them," CFA's directorship maestro, Dr. Kevin Roberts, said in a report. "We are aroused to promote that nationwide sue enthusiasm to attest to CBS' resolving to affiliated to the ad."

CBS has made its resolving and the network is not probably to mutate its bearing a infrequent days in pick to the Super Bowl.

Greene said her is that the NFL will-power not concordant with in and services its tidy clout to vexation CBS into making an about-face on the Tebow ad. She said she intends to jog the memory the NFL that the pay-off concerns the fastest growing separate of its spectators -- that 40 percent of Super Bowl viewers are women.

"This is not contemporary to reasonable leave away," Greene said, "and if the ad runs, it's not contemporary to leave away reasonable because the Super Bowl will-power be primarily."

Send e-mail to

especially smallwj@phillynews.com especially

For fresh columns, leave to

especially belittling especially.

To look upon more of the Philadelphia Daily News, or to subscribe to the newspaper, leave to especially belittling especially especially. Copyright (c) 2010, Philadelphia Daily News Distributed sooner than McClatchy-Tribune Information Services. For reprints, e mail especially belittling tmsreprints@permissionsgroup.com especially especially, term 800-374-7985 or 847-635-6550, radiate a fax to 847-635-6968, or notation to The Permissions Group Inc., 1247 Milwaukee Ave., Suite 303, Glenview, IL 60025, USA.