In France, energy, Karen Millen Outlet the nuclear debate that takes center stage. PS, who had already taken a soft on this topic during the presidential campaign, displays its disunity with the recent statement of Arnaud Montebourg, supported by Manuel Valls: The nuclear industry is a future. Understood: Karen Millen Dresses the opponents of the industry are traditionalists, dreamers. The truth is that it is pro nuclear are dreamers. As we will not know secure nuclear energy, whether in production, decommissioning or waste, it is unrealistic to think that we are immune to tragic accidents. Total nuclear safety does not http://www.karenmillenonline-uk.com exist in the current state of knowledge and technology. Some thought they could reassure themselves by arguing that Chernobyl was the result of mismanagement guilty, but then Fukushima happened in a country renowned for its technology and organization. Be satisfied Karen Millen Dress with a degree of high security back to play with statistics, in an area where there should yet leave no room for chance. Concretely, this means that if the equipment is subject to an event that exceeds the thresholds, a disaster may occur. Such probability calculations are eligible when the predictable damage are restricted to a small area. They are no longer in the case of nuclear risks. In addition, karen millen dress this level of security supposed to reassure us can not in practice be maintained if a whole series of conditions are met: financial capacity to invest in the design, manufacture and maintenance of equipment; flawless organization of operations. None of this can not be guaranteed at all times and in all places. Privatization submit to arbitration decisions in which the profit is necessarily share; crises submit public resources to harsh constraints and may entered have dinner disintegration or perversion organizations and authorities (history abounds with examples of this). Still do not we talk about risk here of terrorism and proliferation of nuclear weapons. Sit on the volcano wearing a confident smile is not a sign of mental health. Time of technocrats and political lives, the majority of them, at the rate of short careers and elections. The time of the nuclear account it tens and hundreds of years, during which many changes may occur. We bequeath waste HAVL (High Activity and Long Life) to a few hundreds of generations to come. Waste radioactive site of the National Agency for Radioactive Waste Management, provides a good illustration of soothing speech that we used the nuclear techno. Under the title The challenge of science and technology (hey, it's a challenge? ...), We learn that Many research and studies are being conducted to develop waste storage for most radioactive with long lifetimes. Given their nature, these wastes must be stored in underground facilities built up to several hundred meters. The challenge: build, operate and monitor underground storage facilities and ensure their s? hardness at such depths and scales very long time. Who can claim to know karen millen what will be the environmental, social, political horizons such time? Is it permissible to think in challenge and throwing challenges in such matters (fissile)? Goes one account and we leave to others - our successors on the planet - the task of meeting these challenges? The nuclear risks are particularly impressive and media. Unless we know the competition for energy resources is also in competition with food resources and water on the planet. A war is being sneaky for sharing land and water: the benefit of energy production or for the benefit of food production. It occurs mainly in two forms: biofuels (wrongly qualified biofuels) and shale gas. Biofuels, which contribute significantly to the continued deforestation of the planet, also divert millions of hectares of arable land in agricultural production. According to Oxfam, karen millen dresses it is 230 million hectares (approximately 4 times the total area of ??France and eight times the size of its agricultural lands) that have been converted by investors since 2001. Biofuels are also extremely voracious water. Regarding shale gas, Le Monde, 24 August t tells us that the United States, the drilling companies are desperately seeking thousands of cubic meters of water needed to fracture the rock, which now opposes the farmers who are trying to keep their precious water resources. The economic and financial crisis has overshadow the environmental debate. At this rate, if nuclear risks we save, we will end up hungry and thirsty, but largely filled fuel for our air-conditioned vehicles.
Nuclear risk karen millen dress could starve us and thirsty
In France, energy, Karen Millen Outlet the nuclear debate that takes center stage. PS, who had already taken a soft on this topic during the presidential campaign, displays its disunity with the recent statement of Arnaud Montebourg, supported by Manuel Valls: The nuclear industry is a future. Understood: Karen Millen Dresses the opponents of the industry are traditionalists, dreamers. The truth is that it is pro nuclear are dreamers. As we will not know secure nuclear energy, whether in production, decommissioning or waste, it is unrealistic to think that we are immune to tragic accidents. Total nuclear safety does not http://www.karenmillenonline-uk.com exist in the current state of knowledge and technology. Some thought they could reassure themselves by arguing that Chernobyl was the result of mismanagement guilty, but then Fukushima happened in a country renowned for its technology and organization. Be satisfied Karen Millen Dress with a degree of high security back to play with statistics, in an area where there should yet leave no room for chance. Concretely, this means that if the equipment is subject to an event that exceeds the thresholds, a disaster may occur. Such probability calculations are eligible when the predictable damage are restricted to a small area. They are no longer in the case of nuclear risks. In addition, karen millen dress this level of security supposed to reassure us can not in practice be maintained if a whole series of conditions are met: financial capacity to invest in the design, manufacture and maintenance of equipment; flawless organization of operations. None of this can not be guaranteed at all times and in all places. Privatization submit to arbitration decisions in which the profit is necessarily share; crises submit public resources to harsh constraints and may entered have dinner disintegration or perversion organizations and authorities (history abounds with examples of this). Still do not we talk about risk here of terrorism and proliferation of nuclear weapons. Sit on the volcano wearing a confident smile is not a sign of mental health. Time of technocrats and political lives, the majority of them, at the rate of short careers and elections. The time of the nuclear account it tens and hundreds of years, during which many changes may occur. We bequeath waste HAVL (High Activity and Long Life) to a few hundreds of generations to come. Waste radioactive site of the National Agency for Radioactive Waste Management, provides a good illustration of soothing speech that we used the nuclear techno. Under the title The challenge of science and technology (hey, it's a challenge? ...), We learn that Many research and studies are being conducted to develop waste storage for most radioactive with long lifetimes. Given their nature, these wastes must be stored in underground facilities built up to several hundred meters. The challenge: build, operate and monitor underground storage facilities and ensure their s? hardness at such depths and scales very long time. Who can claim to know karen millen what will be the environmental, social, political horizons such time? Is it permissible to think in challenge and throwing challenges in such matters (fissile)? Goes one account and we leave to others - our successors on the planet - the task of meeting these challenges? The nuclear risks are particularly impressive and media. Unless we know the competition for energy resources is also in competition with food resources and water on the planet. A war is being sneaky for sharing land and water: the benefit of energy production or for the benefit of food production. It occurs mainly in two forms: biofuels (wrongly qualified biofuels) and shale gas. Biofuels, which contribute significantly to the continued deforestation of the planet, also divert millions of hectares of arable land in agricultural production. According to Oxfam, karen millen dresses it is 230 million hectares (approximately 4 times the total area of ??France and eight times the size of its agricultural lands) that have been converted by investors since 2001. Biofuels are also extremely voracious water. Regarding shale gas, Le Monde, 24 August t tells us that the United States, the drilling companies are desperately seeking thousands of cubic meters of water needed to fracture the rock, which now opposes the farmers who are trying to keep their precious water resources. The economic and financial crisis has overshadow the environmental debate. At this rate, if nuclear risks we save, we will end up hungry and thirsty, but largely filled fuel for our air-conditioned vehicles.