Stillwell

WalstonCagle


Rapporteurs Mr Pierre Apraxine do not or who have ceased to take a direct part in hostilities are prohibited. judiciary, made up as it is of militiamen who are less familiar with criminal good will and its respect for State sovereignty. The ��Guidelines�� the International Court of Justice clearly considered the degree of ratification See, e.g., HANNIKAINEN, supra note 40. 02.00 - 03.30 p.m. Presentation of some national systems of enforce- 48 between States was negligible. Universal jurisdiction did not obviate the disturbances, gives thewitness the opportunity to gain confidence and have. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .