New York – George W. Bush said we could launch a wave of democratic reform in the Arab world by standing firm against tyranny. Does the uprising in Egypt vindicate him?Surprisingly, President Obama's handling of the Egypt revolt hasin Washington. Aover his predecessor's policies, and the specific question of whetherthe waves of popular uprisings in the Middle East vindicate President George W. Bush's "freedom agenda." Is Bush's promotion ofU.S.-fostered democracy in the region just now bearing fruit, or areArabs revolting in spite of Bush's Mideast record?Obama blew it by ditching the Bush Doctrine: The uprisings sweeping across the Mideast "make it clear that Bush had it right," , and that "the Obama administration's abandonment" of Bush's push for Arab "self-government" is "nothing short of a tragedy." If Obama hadn't "dismissed Bush's 'freedom agenda' as overly ideological," the wave would have started sooner, and spread wider.Bush set back the democracy movement: "What exactly is the 'it' that George W. Bush supposedly had right?" . The "centerpiece" of his "freedom agenda" was trying to inject democracy into Iraq "through the barrel of a gun," which did more to "sour Middle Easterners on the idea of political change in the name of democracy and freedom" than anything else. A "push" from the U.S. can't make Arab states into "workable liberal democracies."Bush and Obama mostly talked a good game: Both presidents have actually hit similar rhetorical notes about backing the right of Arabs to a free government, . But when push came to shove, "neither the Bush nor the Obama administrations ever mounted a full-court press for greater democratic freedoms in Egypt" or other Arab regimes. Bush was hampered by his war on terror; Obama by his quest for Arab-Israeli peace.What about an "Obama Doctrine"?: None of this makes Bush wrong, . In fact, Egypt's uprising only proves that both he and Obama were right to reject the "essentially racist assumption" that Arabs don't long for freedom and self-government like the rest of us. What we need now is "a clear Obama Doctrine" for other Arabs "yearning for liberty," so they can "know before they go into the streets whether the United States will be on their side."View this article on GetIssues of The WeekOther stories from this topic:Opinion Brief: Opinion Brief: Timeline: - - Just Died in Your Arms Tonight .Pop Up 3 .In-Laws .Angels of Love .The Karma release Meditation
Does Egypt prove Bush was right?
New York – George W. Bush said we could launch a wave of democratic reform in the Arab world by standing firm against tyranny. Does the uprising in Egypt vindicate him?Surprisingly, President Obama's handling of the Egypt revolt hasin Washington. Aover his predecessor's policies, and the specific question of whetherthe waves of popular uprisings in the Middle East vindicate President George W. Bush's "freedom agenda." Is Bush's promotion ofU.S.-fostered democracy in the region just now bearing fruit, or areArabs revolting in spite of Bush's Mideast record?Obama blew it by ditching the Bush Doctrine: The uprisings sweeping across the Mideast "make it clear that Bush had it right," , and that "the Obama administration's abandonment" of Bush's push for Arab "self-government" is "nothing short of a tragedy." If Obama hadn't "dismissed Bush's 'freedom agenda' as overly ideological," the wave would have started sooner, and spread wider.Bush set back the democracy movement: "What exactly is the 'it' that George W. Bush supposedly had right?" . The "centerpiece" of his "freedom agenda" was trying to inject democracy into Iraq "through the barrel of a gun," which did more to "sour Middle Easterners on the idea of political change in the name of democracy and freedom" than anything else. A "push" from the U.S. can't make Arab states into "workable liberal democracies."Bush and Obama mostly talked a good game: Both presidents have actually hit similar rhetorical notes about backing the right of Arabs to a free government, . But when push came to shove, "neither the Bush nor the Obama administrations ever mounted a full-court press for greater democratic freedoms in Egypt" or other Arab regimes. Bush was hampered by his war on terror; Obama by his quest for Arab-Israeli peace.What about an "Obama Doctrine"?: None of this makes Bush wrong, . In fact, Egypt's uprising only proves that both he and Obama were right to reject the "essentially racist assumption" that Arabs don't long for freedom and self-government like the rest of us. What we need now is "a clear Obama Doctrine" for other Arabs "yearning for liberty," so they can "know before they go into the streets whether the United States will be on their side."View this article on GetIssues of The WeekOther stories from this topic:Opinion Brief: Opinion Brief: Timeline: - - Just Died in Your Arms Tonight .Pop Up 3 .In-Laws .Angels of Love .The Karma release Meditation