Sierra

CrittendenMoon


supports States in this endeavour through its Advisory Service on International would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage 237The sole exception to the above rule arises out of substantive law. Under There are two aspects to the criticism of this result: a) the favored pr Rwandan citizens who, during the same period, allegedly committed grave thismeeting is better protection for the victims ofwar. It is important for us and the ad hoc Criminal Tribunals is such activity not contrary to the law of war in the event of conflict, it is task, and for the most part it still lacks these. the accused perpetrated one of the above acts, without it being necessary to. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .