New links blog

Smoking conventional cigarettes

There's no doubt that electric cigarettes are made and promoted mainly as being a definite alternative cigarette. Therefore, they shouldn't be susceptible to jurisdiction through the Food and drug administration, which presently doesn't have jurisdiction over cigarettes.

http://pollennetwork.org/?q=content/stop-smoking-were-no-more-available
http://www.guj.com.br/user/profile/154313.java
http://mubi.com/users/5725374/
http://themes.simplethemes.com/skeleton/topic/dfgdfgd
http://aranormar.hpage.com/

Rather, they must be susceptible to regulation through the Ftc, that ought to make sure that any advertising claims being made are accurate. Additionally, efforts ought to be made to make sure that these items aren't offered to minors.

http://myanimelist.net/profile/zelsil
http://www.design21sdn.com/people/105700
http://jmbrew.com/forums/topic/putting-it-altogether
http://www.medpedia.com/users/49117
http://unfolding.enfolded.net/?topic=elevated-concentration-of-puffing-on-electric-cigarettes

However, the final factor on the planet that people want from the public health perspective is perfect for the Food and drug administration to manage (meaning prohibit) electric cigarettes. No evidence continues to be given to claim that either from the FDA's concerns are warranted.

http://www.xtimeline.com/profile/index.aspx?id=248921
http://bigcontact.com/andyah
http://totalblacktv.com/myview/uprofile.php?UID=46021
http://harondar.angelfire.com/
http://www.futuremajority.com/user/nogthik

First, there's no evidence that electric cigarettes are used by minors, or by nonsmokers. They're clearly being promoted to people who smoke, and never either to minors or nonsmokers. Market research by one ecigarette company says the typical chronilogical age of ecigarette customers is 44 which the typical amount smoked by these people (just before using e-cigarettes) has ended 1 pack each day.

http://www.everytrail.com/profile.php?user_id=1173564
http://pie-magazine.net/community/topic/keep-in-mind-that-all-nicotine-that-contains-items/
http://www.dailystrength.org/people/2520992/journal/5464678

Second, there's no evidence that electric cigarettes pose any undue harm in accordance with the smoking of conventional cigarettes that will warrant their being taken off the marketplace. A laboratory study from the pollutants from electric cigarettes confirmed the only significant pollutants are nicotine and propylene glycol.

http://www.ptichika.n.nu/
http://www.kiwibox.com/meduzka/blog/
http://sklad.cumc.columbia.edu/nursing/acceptedApplicants/drupForum/?q=node/44211
http://pages.rediff.com/greenavis-e-cig/1855875

I applaud Bill Godshall to be a voice of reason about this problem. The result of taking electric cigarettes from the market wouldn't be a decrease in the amount of people becoming hooked on nicotine. Rather, the end result could be a rise in the the amount of people using conventional cigarettes.

http://karalenka.by/blog/relaxation-story
http://www.defendantlawyers.com/electric-cigarettes-cause-cancer
http://www.hotelchatter.com/user/jeramkoli
http://slonikus.blogg.asia/

This kind of action through the Food and drug administration would unquestionably lead to doing harm to the public's health if you take away a safer alternative for 1000's of e-cigarette customers and basically forcing them to return to smoking conventional cigarettes, which we all know are much more hazardous.

http://uranaelp.punt.nl/
http://www.infobarrel.com/Users/hammlyno
http://www.23hq.com/cuyerdanha/story/9389806
http://sitemn.gr/klaviatu/

There's pointless to think that current ecigarette customers would stop smoking entirely if e-cigs are drawn in the market. Actually, there's very little possibility of that occurring, since using these items has ongoing their contact with nicotine. Rather, they'll likely go back to conventional cigarettes.

http://bedfordbeacon.com/board/topic.php?id=23620
http://journalspace.com/members/milnitsa/
http://fydnethend.blogetery.com/

As the Food and drug administration seems to become acting from ideological concerns, it ought to keep in mind that its charge would be to safeguard the public's health, to not enforce a specific ideology.

http://www.woodjunky.com/content/tobacco-free-united-kingdom-organization
http://fixlinux.com/forums/topic/pr-release-itself-appreciates-the-headline/
http://maragona.jouwweb.nl/

When the Food and drug administration does not act within the most prudent way, hopefully the courts will notice that e-cigarettes are just that - cigarettes, and therefore rule they shouldn't be susceptible to Food and drug administration jurisdiction.

http://yntallet.metroblog.com/greenavis_best_e_cig
http://zylesda.freeoda.com/
http://earlisig.fss.uu.nl/forums/topic/personal-encounters-with-electric-cigarettes/
http://www.accessconsciousness.tv/blog_view/blog/5

I'd near by observing this story demonstrates another reason enactment from the Food and drug administration tobacco legislation will be a public health disaster. In the event that legislation is passed, then electric cigarettes is going to be placed directly under Food and drug administration jurisdiction and also the product will in all probability need to be drawn in the market underneath the stringent rules established for the reason that legislation for reduced risk items (which will make it virtually impossible to promote a really safer product for example e-cigarettes).

http://veehd.com/profile/666667
http://americancowboy.com/users/ervistonik
http://mag.ma/dantoya
http://www.iamsport.org/pg/profile/pomayl

Case another concrete illustration of the way the Food and drug administration tobacco legislation could be devastating towards the public's health. We just can't afford to permit ideology to obtain when it comes to public health protection.

http://jedobuga.mysites.nl/mypages/jedobuga/533343.html
http://socl.pupaclic.com/the_incubator/topic/european-respiratory-system-society/
http://www.instructables.com/member/cyndange/

Finally, it's obvious the real purpose and effect from the Food and drug administration tobacco legislation would be to safeguard the traditional cigarette market from competition. And regrettably, that competition - even without the Food and drug administration legislation - will come from truly reduced risk items, for example electric cigarettes.

http://www.kiwibox.com/sannyster/blog/entry/104405451/greenavis-electronic-cig/?pPage=0
http://cashakn.simpsite.nl/
http://orgs.up.edu/totle/index.php?q=node/1850

This really is the key reason why Philip Morris was brilliant and informative enough to sit down lower using the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids and forge an offer that will provide the Food and drug administration limited regulating jurisdiction over tobacco items, and in ways that safeguards existing items at the fee for new, potentially reduced risk ones.