Meanwhile, Yuva also said that the BMC had failed to chalk out a plan for communication and management between stakeholders responsible for creating these affordable houses, including Mhada, SRA and BMC.”. Meanwhile, many provisions in the SRA houses, such as an optional kitchen or artificial light and ventilation seem to be small compromises in exchange for houses in the city, but may prove problematic in the long run for occupants.Experts have called the affordable housing scheme under the Draft Development Plan 2034 published by BMC last month a “ploy” to create provisions for acquisition of major chunks of land in Mumbai.City-based NGOs — Youth for Unity and Voluntary Action (YUVA) and Hamara Shehar Vikas Niyojan Abhiyaan Mumbai (HSM) — claimed that the number of affordable houses that BMC hopes to create through the DP seems achievable after an analysis of Mhada and SRA constructions’ track record.

At an interactive session conducted by HSM, a group of NGOs held public consultation with experts in the fields of urban development, housing, slum development and rehabilitation as also members from the Tata Institute of Social Sciences. Even though on the one hand, wholesale steel suppliers the DP talks about a cafeteria-like approach to redevelopment, where citizens get to choose from an array of options, the DCR has very stringent punishments for citizens who do not settle for compensatory transit camps.Arvind Unni from Yuva said, “In the course of analysing the DP, we came across several problematic contradictions in DP and Development Control Regulations.