infinito

l'hai chiamato il dottore?..una tachipirina la puoi prendere?..riposatiii, detto questo, sarebbe l'unico tatuagio che mi permetteri..se per disgrazia dovessi restare senza seno..perchè no!..forse meglio delle protesi di silicone..un altro modo di essere..donna di fiori

ahahahah..Il dottore? E certo,ma per telefono..Mara,sono due giorni che prendo Efferalgan 1000,al pomeriggio quando sale a 39,ma oggi credo che arriveà anche un antibiotico.. MARA...NON NE POSSO PIù DI STARE A CASA...se non si fosse così freddo,uscirei a frami i miei dieci minuti ,,intorno al palazzo..grrrrrrrrrrrrrrr. ci ho provato,ma...devo viaggiare con la trinidina,finchè campo.. Non è facile,starmi accanto..ahahahahah..

E' bellisssimo,come si può censurare un tatuaggio che ,tra l'altro,aiuta una donna a superare un trauma come una mastectomia?

So what’s wrong with the review from the sustainability perspective? Well, LED lights manufacturers the fundamental problem is that it doesn’t stress the obvious link between long-term financial performance and sustainability issues. As most people now understand, the further ahead one looks the more issues such as climate change will bite with direct consequences on company operations and asset values.Good long-term investment must now consider these issues but the review doesn’t make that point as forcefully as it should have done. This is shown most clearly in the statements of best practice proposed for company directors, asset holders (e.g. pension funds and insurance companies) and fund managers. The statement for directors includes the obligation to consider long-term factors “including relevant environmental, social and governance issues”. But the other Swarovski Crystal Jewelry two -for the people who own and manage the assets- do not have the same language. Any prudent fund manager should be considering those factors and any entity owning assets should be checking that their fund manager is doing so. But by not making it a listed item of best practice the pressure on every fund manager to do it is lessened. That is a significant failing. (For our thoughts on what’s needed for a more sustainable economy click here.) So will the review change attitudes and practices in investing? Will it encourage improved chanel bags online consideration of the “long-term”? Well, with the caveat that some further action by Government may be required I think the answer is a qualified yes, the recommendations will encourage some change in some areas and that is to be welcomed. But by missing the opportunity to put key long-term issues such as the environment firmly on agendas throughout the equity investing chain the review doesn’t go as far as it could have done.