Creato da iancardarelli il 24/10/2005

PADOVA STUDY CLUB

Dr Ian Cardarelli Via Luca Belludi n.3, 35123 - 049/8758345

 

 

Univ. Prof: MR Dr. Rudolf Slavicek

Post n°9 pubblicato il 04 Dicembre 2006 da iancardarelli
Foto di iancardarelli

Univ. Prof:
MR Dr. Rudolf Slavicek


Dr. Ian Cardarelli
Padova 8-9 Aprile 2007

Complessità del sistema masticatorio:

- L’evoluzione dell’organo masticatorio e la sua funzione
- Il modello cibernetico dell’organo masticatorio per la diagnosi e per il trattamento

Strutture anatomiche

- Il Sistema Cranio Mandibolare (SMM)
- Le strutture articolari dure
- Le strutture legamentose (dell’articolazione)
- Le strutture retroarticolari
- La muscolatura propria del sistema articolare della masticazione
- Il sistema neuromuscolare (SNM). La muscolatura dell’organo masticatorio
- Occlusione e Articolazione

Funzioni

- La masticazione: definizione e trattazione scientifica
- Il linguaggio: fisiologia e patofisiologia
- La postura: fisiologia e patofisiologia
- Estetica oggettiva e soggettiva
- La funzione di controllo dello stress (modello di funzione durante il serramento e digrignamento)

Diagnosi funzionale clinica

- Anamnesi
- Analisi funzionale clinica (fisiodiagnostica)
- Indagini sui processi motori dei gruppi muscolari antagonisti
- Analisi funzionale clinica con ausilio strumentale (condilografia)
- Diagnostica supplementare clinica teleradiografia per l’analisi cefalometrica indicativa per la diagnosi ed il piano di trattamento dei pazienti disfunzionali
 

Il corso si rivolge ad Odontoiatri che desiderano approfondire in modo scientifico le problematiche anatomopatologiche dell’apparato masticatorio. Scopo del corso è fornire i presupposti per poter inquadrare correttamente la diagnosi ed impostare un trattamento individualizzato del paziente con problematiche dell’organo masticatorio. Particolare riguardo sarà dato all’aspetto funzionale che ha determinato lo sviluppo e l’evoluzione del sistema masticatorio. L’utilizzo di strumenti come il condilografo, permette, se associato sempre ad una analisi clinica, di approfondire questi aspetti.
Verranno fornite esemplificazioni su casi clinici. Conduttore del corso uno dei più autorevoli maestri, il Prof. Slavicek, autore di approfondimenti scientifici e numerose pubblicazioni sull’argomento.
Dr. Ian Cardarelli
 
 
 
 

Aesthetic considerations on periodontal and implant therapy

Post n°8 pubblicato il 04 Dicembre 2006 da iancardarelli

Prof. Jan Wennstrom
Padova 15-16 Febbraio 2007

Aesthetic considerations on periodontal and implant therapy


Day 1
Periodontal soft tissue aesthetics – biological and clinical considerations
• Factors influencing the position of the soft tissues around the natural tooth
• Access, regenerative and/or resective surgical therapy?
• The periodontal tissues and orthodontic therapy
• Possibilities and limitations in periodontal soft tissue modeling
• Treatment planning discussion

Day 2
Peri-implant soft tissue aesthetics – biological and clinical considerations
• Hard tissue alterations as a result of tooth extraction, surgical intervention for implant placement and remodeling over time
• The peri-implant soft tissue at the facial and the approximal site
• Possibilities and limitations in peri-implant soft tissue modeling
• Treatment planning discussion

 
 
 

Post n°6 pubblicato il 24 Maggio 2006 da iancardarelli
 




BONE TISSUE REMODELING 



I think we should reconsider the dynamics of bone/tissue
remodeling and how signal-proteins are involved in this process.



Referring to the current knowledge of bone/tissue
biology there are only a few facts that we know:



 



1. growth of tissue requires cell division



 



2. properties of the daughter cell need to be identical
to the mother cell, otherwise the resulting tissue would loose its original properties



 



3. these properties of a cell are in accordance with its
location and function (cornea, heart, bone, pancreas, liver, connective
tissue...) ,and are "frozen" within its DNA



 



4. during cell cycle the DNA doubles and thus ensures
the transfer of the properties



 



5. to initiate cell division especially during healing,
the cells need certain proteins, called cytokines of the injured cell, which
are being released by the content spill on the occasion of the injury



 



6. these cytokines need specific receptors on the
target cell to initiate its accelerated cell division



 



7. a cell of a different tissue does not provide these
specific receptors thus avoiding an increased cell division of a non-injured
tissue/cell, that doesn't need healing



 



8. in transplanting tissue pieces to a different
location even within an individual body, the target environment does not match
the receptor-system for the cytokines of the injured cells of the transplant
(the reason for kidney rejection)



 



9. in exchanging bone pieces from the hip, the mandible
or the maxilla, the miss-match of the receptors and the cytokines of the source
and the target environment leads to a stop of the cell cycle, ultimately of the
healing process



 



10. in accordance with its embryologic origin of the
neural crest tube (a very early stage of development) there are three different
bone types with different cytokine/receptor systems:



 



a. skull with the maxilla (forebrain)



b. mandible (midbrain)



c. skeleton (hindbrain)



 



11. there are numerous natural blocking membranes
which avoid unintentional mixing of tissue-specific signal-proteins like
cytokines: e.g. dura mater, pericardium, kidney capsule, pleura and so on



 



12. in bone this is the periosteum



 



13. the denudation of periosteum not only leads to
swelling because the fluid comes out (kind of 'leaking'), but also to the
development of a new blocking 'membrane', a new periosteum as a result of the competing
cytokines of the soft tissue and the bone.



 



14. an artificial blocking membrane inhibits this
competition.



 



In principle this is it. Of course it’s more
complicated than described here, only my humble list. For those who are
interested in further reading I may refer to the textbook of Bruce Alberts: The Molecular Biology Of The Cell, 4th
Ed
., and with regard to the origin of the bone types to Helms, J.A. et al. and their review
article in Nature 423, 2003; abstract
available at Medline.





 
 I agree with the suggestion of using a blocking
membrane. This membrane separates the signal proteins of the soft tissue from
those of the original bone site. It enables an undisturbed regeneration of the
bone tissue within its own encysted environment.


However, the role of the bone transplant is reduced to
being a space-holder. This piece will never be integrated as bone. In contrast
it will be disintegrated into resorbable components by means of MMP’s, other
enzymes and enzyme-catalysed addition of water (hydrolysis) as every biologic/synthetic
(TCP and HP) foreign substance will be. Depending on the amount of its volume this
process takes a more or less long time (app. 1-2 years).



As to your question for anything different: your first
intention was to place too big an implant into a too narrow bone. Instead of
trying to adjust the bone to the implant you may circumnavigate these futile surgical
attempts (imagine the effort of a hip bone transplant) and the disappointment
for you and your patient in switching to a different implant that fits into the
available bone in the first place.



 



Questions are welcome.



 



===============================


 
 
 
 

BIPHOSPHONATES AND IMPLANT DENTISTRY

Post n°5 pubblicato il 21 Febbraio 2006 da iancardarelli

PART1
... The Novartis meeting was a complete emergence in clinical and basic science and problem solving for 2.5 days. Great experience. The company clearly wants to get to the bottom of all this and is just as frustrated as we are with the lack of definitive research. There will be some suggestions coming out of the meeting, and Novartis is wondering whether or not the dental community wants a Proceedings to be published (they worry about appearing to be self-serving, I think). I can say that we were not able to advance our understanding much because so much of the research is anecdotal, but good studies have been started. I don't know how much I am allowed to say now, but I can at least tell you that the Panel will recommend the least possible infection and trauma to the jaws of anyone on a cancer-related bisphosphonate for more than 6 months. Relative to implants, that would tell me that they should not be done in these patients. The Panel will also recommend not stopping the cancer-related bisphosphonates unless there is exposed alveolar bone. You might be surprised to find that in young people and in mice the bisphosphonates seem to help bone healing!
The Panel also looked as osteoporosis-related bisphosphonates, but I wasn't on the subgroup that made those up so I need to look at my notes.
PART 2
Thanks for the update. This sounds like a responsible corporate forum looking at a big problem and trying to develop sound, evidence-based strategy for these patients.
However, we have published guidelines, echoed in several peer-reviewed, independent articles and advisories that state that implants are contraindicated in patients receiving the IV bisphosphonates Aredia and Zometa. All invasive procedures, except the unavoidable, are discouraged for this group.
As far as witholding life-extending medication from these patients in hopes of controlling local disease, there is no evidence to support this recommendation. We have previously dealt with this on the list and have discussed the long-term effects of these drugs. With regard to the comment suggesting stopping these preventive cancer treatments when there is exposed bone, this sounds nonsensical: there is almost always exposed
bone. That's the problem!
The recurring question about Fosamax has also appeared. The patients affected by Fosamax were all, except in an isolated case or two, receiving very high doses intravenously. The garden variety oral Fosamax patient does not fall under these clinical guidelines.

 
 
 

IMPIANTI DENTALI DENTAL IMPLANTS

Post n°4 pubblicato il 28 Novembre 2005 da iancardarelli
Foto di iancardarelli

THIS IS AN EXAMPLE OF THE RESULTS THAT CAN BE OBTAINED TODAY WITH DENTAL IMPLANTS.

 
 
 
Successivi »
 

AREA PERSONALE

 

TAG

 

ARCHIVIO MESSAGGI

 
 << Aprile 2024 >> 
 
LuMaMeGiVeSaDo
 
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          
 
 

CERCA IN QUESTO BLOG

  Trova
 

FACEBOOK

 
 

ULTIME VISITE AL BLOG

losartoanankefilmiancardarellidr.melonebarbagiallomalagrino.juanpablosalvatore.belcastromassimiliano.monialessia.guidatatianafernandeskonylc.gaetacekena0camifrasincis1
 

ULTIMI COMMENTI

CHI PUÒ SCRIVERE SUL BLOG

Solo l'autore può pubblicare messaggi in questo Blog e tutti gli utenti registrati possono pubblicare commenti.
 
RSS (Really simple syndication) Feed Atom
 
 
 

© Italiaonline S.p.A. 2024Direzione e coordinamento di Libero Acquisition S.á r.l.P. IVA 03970540963