Abejundio blog

Abejundio blog

Creato da ioratkuey il 02/09/2010

Area personale

 

Tag

 

Archivio messaggi

 
 << Luglio 2024 >> 
 
LuMaMeGiVeSaDo
 
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        
 
 

Cerca in questo Blog

  Trova
 

FACEBOOK

 
 

Ultime visite al Blog

tiefblaumisteropaganoassunta51arcobalenorosaPiero_Calzonasybilla_cdamorevivoBridgetJones82animadea0aniram1959sereeena86eterna47vivalentinlandbouwkredietm.a.r.y.s.e
 

Chi puņ scrivere sul blog

Solo l'autore puņ pubblicare messaggi in questo Blog e tutti gli utenti registrati possono pubblicare commenti.
 
RSS (Really simple syndication) Feed Atom
 
 

 

« Cantor: Eliminating taxp...SkillSurvey® Welcomes Or... »

Chrysler's 'embarrassing' decision to spend $9 million on a Super Bowl ad

Post n°13 pubblicato il 09 Febbraio 2011 da ioratkuey
 
Tag: friuli

New York – Many critics were inspired by the car company's two-minute defense of Detroit. Others argue that the price is inappropriately high for a company in debt

Chrysler broadcast an epic two-minute commercial during the Super Bowl that was less a traditional car ad than a tribute to Detroit. (See video below.) The commercial — the longest in Super Bowl history — proved a , who connected with its stirring imagery and hopeful message about the struggling city's future. But not everyone was left inspired by Chrysler's paean to the Motor City. A Republican congressman and other conservativesthat Chrysler still owes the government $5.8 billion in bailout money, and that spending millions on an ad is problematic for a beleaguered company in debt. (Chrysler's CEO says the ad cost less than $9 million.) Was the car maker right to splurge on its buzzworthy spot?

The ad was too expensive and misleading: "Chrysler took $15 billion from taxpayers, to which it wasn't entitled," , and made a commercial full of falsehoods. For instance, Chrysler did not "go through the hottest fires," as the ad suggests — unless "hottest fires" means "skipping bankruptcy and asking for a handout toprotect union pensions." This hypocritical ad just goes to show "howthe federal government picks winners and losers. Guess which part thetaxpayers play?"

The commercial was insulting, too: It's bad enough that the U.S. spent billions to rescue Chrysler afterdecades of poor decisions, . Now this ad, coupled with recent complaints from Chrysler's CEO that the government was charging his company outrageousinterest rates, really puts things over the top. This commercial was truly "the most embarrassing gaffe" of the Super Bowl.  

The pay-off has been worth it: Despite "advance criticism of Chrysler for making a $9 million commitment," , this ad has made an almost unprecedented impact. It continues to "live large on the internet." More than 2,000 news organizations have mentioned it, generating more than 200 million web hits. On YouTube, "the video has been viewed more 1.2 million times in less than 24 hours." And the "ad is already proving its value." Web-traffic to the Chrysler 200 site increased more than 1,600 percent in the hours after the ad aired.

 

Svi Hitovi .Rauhnacht . Reel Kombat .Crayons 2004 (including MV remix) .Merc

 
 
 
Vai alla Home Page del blog
 
 

© Italiaonline S.p.A. 2024Direzione e coordinamento di Libero Acquisition S.á r.l.P. IVA 03970540963